[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] C-c ^ not fully useful
From: |
Carsten Dominik |
Subject: |
Re: [O] C-c ^ not fully useful |
Date: |
Mon, 25 Feb 2013 10:35:47 +0100 |
On 25 feb. 2013, at 10:28, Bastien <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hi François,
>
> sorting list items and headlines is now done against the visible
> part of the item and headlines, i.e., it ignores hidden links and
> emphasis markers.
Hi Bastien,
are you sure it removes emphasis markers as well? Looks to me that
org-sort-remove-invisible only removes links. I guess it could be rewritten
looking at invisibility properties, but that might be problematic when sorting
includes a part of the buffer that has not yet been visible in a window and
therefore might not be propertized properly.
- Carsten
>
> I am not sure it is useful to add a parameter to `org-sort-list' and
> `org-sort-entries' to let the user change this default behavior: do
> you have a significant use-case for this?
>
> François Pinard <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> - Could some parameterisation be added so one could map user written
>> functions over (free) option letters?
>
> Here again, my feeling is that it would be over-engineered -- would
> you use it yourself? How?
>
> Thanks for suggesting this improvements!
>
> --
> Bastien
>
--
Having an entire horizon of things you half-care about. -- Merlin Mann in
"Inbox Zero"