[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] org-meta-return
|
From: |
Eric Abrahamsen |
|
Subject: |
Re: [O] org-meta-return |
|
Date: |
Sun, 03 Mar 2013 18:44:47 +0800 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.2 (gnu/linux) |
Michael Brand <address@hidden> writes:
> Hi John
>
> On Feb 21, 2013 10:16 PM, "42 147" <address@hidden> wrote:
>> [continues off-topic]
>>
>> > Have you tried a Dvorak keyboard?
>>
>> A friend of mine ridicules me for being a QWERTY typist, but I have
> found
>> no empirical evidence that it is actually superior. At best, it has
> been
>> proven, in /some/ studies, to be /slightly/ superior; and from a
>> cost-benefit standpoint, /slight/ superiority according to /some/
> studies
>> (and I should add, only at extreme speeds), is not worth relearning
> how to
>> type.
>
> Colemak is a much better keyboard layout than Dvorak. I have been
> using Colemak for many years now with great pleasure.
Whoa, that's what I was looking for! Keyboard layout taped to the wall,
typing this in Colemak now. Thanks for the tip.
E