[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] (no subject)
From: |
Bastien |
Subject: |
Re: [O] (no subject) |
Date: |
Fri, 08 Mar 2013 11:46:04 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
Hi Andreas,
Andreas Röhler <address@hidden> writes:
> BTW does that mean, stars are hard-coded in a way, they can't be
> replaced by another car?
Yes, this is the case.
> If yes, what about to keep the core more abstract?
This is a hard problem and I personally don't think it's worth
tackling it. But I don't want to decourage anyone, of course :)
--
Bastien
- [O] [RFC] Org syntax (draft), Nicolas Goaziou, 2013/03/07
- Re: [O] [RFC] Org syntax (draft), Carsten Dominik, 2013/03/07
- Re: [O] [RFC] Org syntax (draft), Achim Gratz, 2013/03/07
- Re: [O] [RFC] Org syntax (draft), Bastien, 2013/03/08
- [O] was: [RFC] Org syntax (draft), Andreas Röhler, 2013/03/08
- Re: [O] (no subject),
Bastien <=
- Re: [O] (no subject), Andreas Röhler, 2013/03/08
- Re: [O] (no subject), Bastien, 2013/03/08
- Re: [O] (no subject), Andreas Röhler, 2013/03/08
- Re: [O] (no subject), Bastien, 2013/03/08
- Re: [O] (no subject), Andreas Röhler, 2013/03/08
- Re: [O] (no subject), Bastien, 2013/03/08
- Re: [O] (no subject), Andreas Röhler, 2013/03/08
- Re: [O] (no subject), Bastien, 2013/03/08
- Re: [O] (no subject), T.F. Torrey, 2013/03/08
- Re: [O] (no subject), Nicolas Goaziou, 2013/03/08