[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] Link colours in new Worg style
From: |
Suvayu Ali |
Subject: |
Re: [O] Link colours in new Worg style |
Date: |
Fri, 8 Mar 2013 19:05:39 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2012-12-30) |
Hi Bastien,
On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 06:24:12PM +0100, Bastien wrote:
> Hi Suvayu,
>
> Suvayu Ali <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > The new Worg style is amazing; the text is very clear and much more
> > readable now. However I have a major complaint about the links. It
> > seems the new style overrides my browser's colour setting for unvisited
> > and visited links. I think this is extremely confusing. As per my
> > setting, I have blue for unvisited links and purple for visited links.
> > The new style overrides this to red for unvisited and blue for visited.
> > Obviously you can see how this leads to a confusion. I would really
> > appreciate it if this was left to the user and not determined by the
> > webpage.
>
> The previous stylesheet already used non-default colors for
> non-visited and visited links. I just changed the colors.
>
> Here is the setting you saw:
>
> a {text-decoration: none; color: #FF0000; font-weight: 400;}
> a:visited {text-decoration: none; color: #0066CC; font-weight: 400;}
> a:hover {text-decoration: underline; color: #FF0000}
>
> But you're right this is confusing, as this is the exact opposite
> of... most browsers default settings. I swaped the color, let me
> know if this looks better.
>
I don't know why I did not notice that before! Maybe this time I was
browsing around, checking things whereas earlier I knew which entry I
was looking for. In any case, it is less confusing after the switch.
Cheers,
--
Suvayu
Open source is the future. It sets us free.