Re: [O] Bug formatting source code in new latex exporter

[Nicolas Goaziou]

Hello,

Rick Frankel <address@hidden> writes:

> Either way. `:long t' seems a bit less self-documenting than
> `:long-listing', but shorter is always better w/ attributes.

Applied, with :long-listing.

:long is too short...

>> > BTW, a couple of other small things:
>> >
>> >       1. I think `elisp' should be added to the default 
>> >       `org-latex-minted-langs'.
>> 
>> There is no "elisp" language in Babel, is it? I think it's "emacs-lisp".
>
> Maybe it's an in-built alias. This works w/ emacs -Q [...]:
>
> #+BEGIN_SRC elisp
>   "hello"
> #+END_SRC

I don't see any reference to it in the "Languages" section in the
manual. Therefore, I don't think it deserves an entry in
`org-latex-minted-langs' until it becomes more official.

>> >       2. Unrelated, but I spent some time trying to get relative file
>> >       links working. At least in Acrobat Reader on windows, the only
>> >       way file links work is with no protocol at all
>> >       (\url{path/to/file}).
>> 
>> Do you mean the "file:" part should be dropped for files with a relative
>> path?
>
> Yes. Actually, I think it should be dropped from ALL "file:" urls,
> relative or absolute.

I think it could break things. Did you use correct path to relative
files (i.e. did you include "./" before the file name)?


Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou