Re: [O] [PATCH] Override the default class name with a new one.

[Feng Shu]

Rasmus <address@hidden> writes:

> Feng Shu <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> #+LATEX_CLASS: article
>> #+LATEX_CLASS_NAME: ctexart
>
> I'm not sure this is the right approach. . .  I can certainly see the
> value of generating classes on the fly, though.  But somehow the
> proposed syntax just seems to counter-intuitive.  I'm not sure how to
> overcome this, but perhaps it would be better to allow for an argument
> to LATEX_CLASS, e.g.
>
> (*)   #+LATEX_CLASS: myclass :class-name ctexart.


CLASS and class-name are confusing,  I think LATEX_CLASS should rename
to LATEX_CLASS_FORMAT or LATEX_CLASS_TEMPLATE, but this will break 
compatibility.

>
> as e.g. the INCLUDE command.  Of course (*) is somewhat different from
> how stuff like this is usually handled, cf. e.g. LATEX_CLASS_OPTIONS.
>
> –Rasmus

--