[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] [export] Should sidewaystable option automatically add rotating
From: |
Carsten Dominik |
Subject: |
Re: [O] [export] Should sidewaystable option automatically add rotating package? |
Date: |
Sun, 15 Sep 2013 06:49:07 +0200 |
On 13.9.2013, at 10:01, Detlef Steuer <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hi!
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Rasmus <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>>> So the question is should it be a default package?
>>>
>>> I think not. E.g. tabu isn't loaded. Amsmath isn't loaded if you
>>> generate a matrix.
>>
>> I think the "tabu" case (and longtable...) is different from "rotating".
>>
>> No feature in Org requires "tabu" or "longtable" unless user explicitly
>> writes "tabu" or "longtable" somewhere in the buffer (i.e.
>> in :environment attribute).
>>
>> On the other hand, "rotating" or "wrapfig" may be needed without the
>> user knowing about it (e.g. when setting :float or :wrap attributes).
>>
>> Therefore, I think "wrapfig" and "rotating" belong to the same boat.
>> Either we require them both in default packages, or we do not require
>> any and add a footnote about it in the manual. I have no preference.
>>
>
> I think it is more consistent to provide these packages automagically.
>
> There seems no downside besides slightly longer latex startup times.
> Org already loads some default packages to perform its export magic.
> Why not try to be "feature" complete in the sense Nicloas describes:
> User doesn't try something special with latex, but uses
> commands/options provided by org, so a bare bone export can be expected
> work.
>
> Personally I would appreciate it very much if org followed the
> principle of least surprise in these cases, as these surprises tend to
> show up, if time is running out ;-)
OK, let me ask like this:
Does anyone know about conflicts arising from loading wrapfig and rotating?
- Carsten
>
> Just my two user cents.
>
> Detlef
>
>
>> On the same line, we could remove "longtable" from
>> `org-latex-default-packages-alist', if only to spare a few kittens.
>>
>> WDYT?
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> --
>> Nicolas Goaziou
>>
>>
>
>
>
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
Re: [O] [export] Should sidewaystable option automatically add rotating package?, Nicolas Goaziou, 2013/09/12
Re: [O] [export] Should sidewaystable option automatically add rotating package?, Carsten Dominik, 2013/09/12
Re: [O] [export] Should sidewaystable option automatically add rotating package?, Detlef Steuer, 2013/09/13
Re: [O] [export] Should sidewaystable option automatically add rotating package?,
Carsten Dominik <=
Re: [O] [export] Should sidewaystable option automatically add rotating package?, Nicolas Girard, 2013/09/15
Re: [O] [export] Should sidewaystable option automatically add rotating package?, Carsten Dominik, 2013/09/16
Re: [O] [export] Should sidewaystable option automatically add rotating package?, Rasmus, 2013/09/16
Re: [O] [export] Should sidewaystable option automatically add rotating package?, Rainer M Krug, 2013/09/16
Re: [O] [export] Should sidewaystable option automatically add rotating package?, Carsten Dominik, 2013/09/16
Re: [O] [export] Should sidewaystable option automatically add rotating package?, Carsten Dominik, 2013/09/16
Re: [O] [export] Should sidewaystable option automatically add rotating package?, Rasmus, 2013/09/16
Re: [O] [export] Should sidewaystable option automatically add rotating package?, Andreas Leha, 2013/09/16
Re: [O] [export] Should sidewaystable option automatically add rotating package?, Eric Abrahamsen, 2013/09/16
Re: [O] [export] Should sidewaystable option automatically add rotating package?, Carsten Dominik, 2013/09/17