[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] [RFC] Proposal for rebindings in Org 8.3
From: |
Greg Troxel |
Subject: |
Re: [O] [RFC] Proposal for rebindings in Org 8.3 |
Date: |
Mon, 10 Mar 2014 14:07:41 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/23.4 (berkeley-unix) |
Bastien <address@hidden> writes:
> | Key | Command | Proposal | Status |
> |-------+-----------------------------------+------------------+--------|
> | C-c # | Checkboxes | C-c x | Free |
> | C-c ~ | Cooperation | C-c C-~ | Free |
> | C-c , | Priorities | C-c C-, | Free |
> | C-c ? | Editing and debugging formulas | C-c C-? | Free |
> | C-c ! | Creating timestamps | C-c C-! | Free |
I tried C-c C-! in my environment, and it fails, no noticing the C-!
(which involves shift) keypress (with ^H k; I get it that this is
proposed). I have C-1 bound in my window manager to switch desktops,
since that binding doesn't take away the ability to generate any ASCII
character.
I'm running "emacs -nw" under tmux on one machine (netbsd), connected
via ssh from a mac using Terminal.
While one can argue that various emulations are broken, org should be
fully usable with a 7-bit terminal connection, and non-kludgy with an
8-bit connection. In general, I find that emacs works fine with that,
although one has to prefix with ESC instead of the meta key.
I've always been bothered by keybindings like C-S-left, which while
useful, cause there to be no available keystroke sequence to perform the
function.
I find this surprising; I'd expect within emacs/org culture there to be
more people using terminal-mode emacs.
pgpJXFGpCZ67T.pgp
Description: PGP signature
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: [O] [RFC] Proposal for rebindings in Org 8.3,
Greg Troxel <=