[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[O] Bad footnotes when including org files
From: |
Xavier Garrido |
Subject: |
[O] Bad footnotes when including org files |
Date: |
Sun, 16 Mar 2014 00:44:49 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0 |
Hi Orgers,
I am having some troubles with several org files that I want to include
into one general org file. To do that I use the #+INCLUDE: keywords and
actually, everything is working well until I add some footnotes in both
files. Let me show you a minimal example where the footnote numbering is
getting weird
a.org :
-------
* A1
This is A1 section[fn:1].
* A2
This is A2 section.
* Footnotes
[fn:1] this is a footnote in A file.
b.org :
-------
* B1
This B1 section[fn:1].
* B2
This B2 section.
* Footnotes
[fn:1] this a footnote in B file.
ab.org :
--------
#+INCLUDE: "a.org" :minlevel 1
#+INCLUDE: "b.org" :minlevel 1
When I export to LaTeX the latest file, I get two footnotes with the
same number. The problem can be solved by changing the label of the
second footnote to [fn:2] but it means that I have to reorganize and
reorder footnotes within all the org files I will include. I am
wondering if it is possible to run, for example,
=org-footnote-renumber-fn:N= function when including files in such way
the user will not have to take care footnote labels.
Thanks for your help,
Xavier
- [O] Bad footnotes when including org files,
Xavier Garrido <=