[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] [RFC] Creole-style / Support for **emphasis**__within__**a word*
From: |
Nicolas Goaziou |
Subject: |
Re: [O] [RFC] Creole-style / Support for **emphasis**__within__**a word** |
Date: |
Sat, 22 Mar 2014 15:05:21 +0100 |
Hello,
Jambunathan K <address@hidden> writes:
> [RFC] Creole-style / Support for **emphasis**__within__**a word**
>
> The attached files should speak for themselves. Such an arrangement
>
> a) Does not change the status quo AT ALL.
> b) Provide more rope.
>
> The patch is in the spirit of "show and tell". I will not provide a
> formal patch.
>
> What about formalizing such an arrangement...
FWIW I think is the idea is very interesting. This is more verbose, but
it could allow us to get rid of the terrible
`org-emphasis-regexp-components' variable.
Unfortunately, this would introduce incompatibilities in old documents,
unless that is, we keep checking `org-emphasis-regexp-components', but
then, the change would become, IMO, much less desirable.
In a nutshell, I don't think this will go past the active
"backward-compatibility" squad on the ML. What we're really after is
a way to
- keep single character markup ;
- get rid of `org-emphasis-regexp-components' ;
- allow midword markup.
Good luck.
Regards,
--
Nicolas Goaziou
- [O] [RFC] Creole-style / Support for **emphasis**__within__**a word**, Jambunathan K, 2014/03/04
- [O] [RFC] Creole-style / Support for **emphasis**__within__**a word**, Jambunathan K, 2014/03/04
- [O] [RFC] Creole-style / Support for **emphasis**__within__**a word**, Jambunathan K, 2014/03/04
- Re: [O] [RFC] Creole-style / Support for **emphasis**__within__**a word**, Marcin Borkowski, 2014/03/22
- Re: [O] [RFC] Creole-style / Support for **emphasis**__within__**a word**, Suvayu Ali, 2014/03/23
- Re: [O] [RFC] Creole-style / Support for **emphasis**__within__**a word**, Marcin Borkowski, 2014/03/23
- Re: [O] [RFC] Creole-style / Support for **emphasis**__within__**a word**, Jambunathan K, 2014/03/24