[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] [RFC] Properly handle keyword + COMMENT keyword
From: |
Nicolas Goaziou |
Subject: |
Re: [O] [RFC] Properly handle keyword + COMMENT keyword |
Date: |
Mon, 24 Mar 2014 23:04:26 +0100 |
Hello,
Samuel Wales <address@hidden> writes:
> does this preserve todo keyword font locking
This is one goal of the patch.
> and sorting?
IIRC, TODO-based sorting refers to `org-todo-keywords-1', which doesn't
include "COMMENT", so I don't think this changes sorting (i.e., sorting
ignores COMMENT keywords).
> does archive work the same way?
I didn't touch to archive tag (but there's some work to do here to, as
a first step, `org-in-archived-heading-p' would be nice). Note that
ARCHIVE is a tag, though.
> i presume it is a coincidence that this message comes after mine which
> mentioned font locking and sorting
No it isn't. Your message recalled me this needed to be fixed.
> as the fix to that message is to not evaluate or export call lines
> that are not supposed to be exported. i would not find this change to
> be a suitable workaround for that.
I do not want to provide a workaround for what I do not consider to be
a bug. Export and Babel are two different parts of Org that happen to
have a non-empty intersection. "No Export" doesn't have to mean "No
Babel" (unless you use a COMMENT keyword, that is).
Anyway that's another topic.
Regards,
--
Nicolas Goaziou