[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] Problems with org-capture
From: |
Josef Wolf |
Subject: |
Re: [O] Problems with org-capture |
Date: |
Fri, 9 May 2014 09:25:10 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Di, Mai 06, 2014 at 11:57:34 +0200, Josef Wolf wrote:
> I am new to org-mode, and am currently working through
> http://members.optusnet.com.au/~charles57/GTD/gtd_workflow.html and am stuck
> a little bit the the caprure mode.
>
> My first question is: org-capture seems to come with a pre-confuigured
> template for a "Todo" stanza. I thought, I'd take a closer look at this
> example to learn from it and as a starting point for my own
> customizations. But DESCRIBE-VARIABLE shows that ORG-CAPTURE-TEMPLATES is set
> to NIL. So, where does this pre-configured "Todo" entry come from?
>
> The I created my own template like this:
>
> (setq org-capture-templates
> '(("t" "Todo" entry (file+headline "/m/s/rep/git/todo/newgtd.org" "Tasks")
> "* TODO %^{Brief Description} %^g%?\n Created: %U\n %i\n %A\n\n"
> :kill-buffer :empty-lines 3)))
>
> With this template, I have two problems:
>
> - The most annoying problem is that it eats up the newlines behind the newly
> created entry. I always keep multiple empty lines between top-level
> headings. But even then, a newly created entry eats up all the newlines and
> even melts the succeeding heading onto the end of the newly created entry.
> I guess, this is not how it is meant to work. How would I define
>
> - The second problem is that when invoked with content fron an active region
> (the %i flag), then the %A flag won't ask me for a link description and the
> %i contents are used as description.
Any ideas on that problem?
--
Josef Wolf
address@hidden