[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] Escaping again!
From: |
Nicolas Goaziou |
Subject: |
Re: [O] Escaping again! |
Date: |
Sun, 01 Jun 2014 10:44:06 +0200 |
Hello,
Bastien <address@hidden> writes:
> For now description lists accept both "-" and "+". I'm all for
> allowing only "-" so that we could use
>
> + \(+\) :: Int → Int → Int
> + \(-\) :: Int → Int →Int
> + \(\leq\) :: Int → Int → Bool
> + \(=\) :: Int → Int → Bool
>
> in your example.
>
> What do you and others think?
I have no objection, with appropriate documentation, obviously.
Be careful, though, as some functions need to be updated accordingly:
`org-list-struct', `org-element--list-struct',
`org-at-item-description-p', `org-list-item-body-column',
`org-at-item-timer-p', `org-list-insert-item'... The latter should
probably use `org-at-item-description-p'.
Regards,
--
Nicolas Goaziou
- Re: [O] Escaping again!,
Nicolas Goaziou <=