[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] Table of contents for just one section?
From: |
Rasmus |
Subject: |
Re: [O] Table of contents for just one section? |
Date: |
Sun, 26 Oct 2014 16:01:10 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Hi,
Nicolas Goaziou <address@hidden> writes:
> Rasmus <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> I think we can do it with titletoc. I have used other functionality
>> of titletoc, and it 'doesn't sucks'ᵀᴹ. Below is an example. The
>> output is more inline with normal tocs, but you can also style it
>> [I've used this for making paragraph-TOCs in the past].
>>
>> So ox-latex needs to insert at least the following to initialize a
>> local TOC
>>
>> \startcontents[ID-level] % need not be unique and might not be neceasary
>> \printcontents[ID-level]{}{(1+ level)}{TOC OPTIONS}
>>
>> And, importantly — and mildely annoyingly — \startcontents[ID] *after*
>> the next heading of the same level.
>
> I don't quite get this part. Does that string need to be inserted only
> after the second sibling (i.e., not after the third, too)? What happens
> if there is no other sibling?
Ah, it's much easier to use \stopcontents[level-i] to end contents
collection. Revising the example:
\documentclass{book}
\usepackage{titletoc}
\begin{document}
\part{p1}
\startcontents[level-0]
\printcontents[level-0]{}{0}{\setcounter{tocdepth}{2}}
\chapter{c1}
\startcontents[level-1]
\printcontents[level-1]{}{1}{\setcounter{tocdepth}{1}}
\section{s1} \subsection{s2}
\stopcontents[level-1]
\chapter{c2}
\section{s3}
\stopcontents[level-0]
\part{p2}\chapter{c3}
\end{document}
Note that the contents is determined by the .pcf file. Maybe that's
easier to to understand than my babeling. Also, "pcf" should be added
to `org-latex-logfiles-extensions'.
>> There are some preamble options, but since we are doing it
>> programically, it might be safer to insert it into the body.
>
> The patch will not insert "\usepackage{titletoc}" for the user, however,
> à la `org-latex-listings'.
Great.
> What do you call the "brute force"?
I meant to insert \startcontents[ID-level] after each, say, chapter
unconditionally rather than inserterting as few
\startcontents[ID-level] as possible. But ignore that:
\stopcontents[ID-level] it's much cleaner.
>> Let me know what you think and whether you will do it.
>
> I can try to implement it.
>
> I also note that these tocs do not have any title. Would it make sense
> to remove title from local tocs in other back-ends too?
No idea. Both makes sense, but maybe including the TOC-title is too
verbose? In any case, I think it's easy to add a title if you. Based
on article.cls and book.cls, I think we can generalize the toc-title
to "heading one level down in level and unnumbered with title
\contentsname". The TOC title for chapter is thus
\section*{\contentsname}. For \part it's \chapter*{\contentsname}. I
guess you can use the cdr in level part of `org-latex-classes', though
it would be incompatible with e.g. \addsec{·} of KOMA-Script.
—Rasmus
Article.cls:
\newcommand\tableofcontents{%
\section*{\contentsname
address@hidden
\MakeUppercase\contentsname}{\MakeUppercase\contentsname}}%
address@hidden
}
Book.cls:
\newcommand\tableofcontents{%
address@hidden
address@hidden
\else
address@hidden
\fi
\chapter*{\contentsname
address@hidden
\MakeUppercase\contentsname}{\MakeUppercase\contentsname}}%
address@hidden
address@hidden
}
—Rasmus
--
And I faced endless streams of vendor-approved Ikea furniture. . .
- [O] Table of contents for just one section?, D. C. Toedt, 2014/10/15
- Re: [O] Table of contents for just one section?, Nicolas Goaziou, 2014/10/20
- Re: [O] Table of contents for just one section?, D. C. Toedt, 2014/10/20
- Re: [O] Table of contents for just one section?, Nicolas Goaziou, 2014/10/26
- Re: [O] Table of contents for just one section?, D. C. Toedt, 2014/10/26
- Re: [O] Table of contents for just one section?, Rasmus, 2014/10/26
- Re: [O] Table of contents for just one section?, Nicolas Goaziou, 2014/10/26
- Re: [O] Table of contents for just one section?,
Rasmus <=
- Re: [O] Table of contents for just one section?, Rasmus, 2014/10/26
Re: [O] Table of contents for just one section?, Rasmus, 2014/10/26