[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] Efficiency of Org v. LaTeX v. Word
From: |
John Kitchin |
Subject: |
Re: [O] Efficiency of Org v. LaTeX v. Word |
Date: |
Sun, 04 Jan 2015 15:38:42 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4.50 (darwin) |
Ken Mankoff <address@hidden> writes:
Did anyone see the parody of this here:
http://mjambon.github.io/vim-vs-emacs/
It is pretty funny!
> People here might be interested in a publication from [2014-12-19 Fri]
> available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115069
>
> Title: An Efficiency Comparison of Document Preparation Systems Used
> in Academic Research and Development
>
> Summary: Word users are more efficient and have less errors than even
> experienced LaTeX users.
>
> Someone here should repeat experiment and add Org into the mix, perhaps
> Org -> ODT and/or Org -> LaTeX and see if it helps or hurts. I assume
> Org would trump LaTeX, but would Org -> ODT or Org -> X -> DOCX (via
> pandoc) beat straight Word?
>
> -k.
>
>
>
--
-----------------------------------
John Kitchin
Professor
Doherty Hall A207F
Department of Chemical Engineering
Carnegie Mellon University
Pittsburgh, PA 15213
412-268-7803
http://kitchingroup.cheme.cmu.edu
- Re: [O] Efficiency of Org v. LaTeX v. Word,
John Kitchin <=