[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] parser: verbatim or code?
From: |
Sebastien Vauban |
Subject: |
Re: [O] parser: verbatim or code? |
Date: |
Fri, 30 Jan 2015 12:02:59 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (windows-nt) |
Aaron Ecay wrote:
> 2015ko urtarrilak 23an, Sebastien Vauban-ek idatzi zuen:
>>> Since = and ~ have been inverted, I think it'd make sense to make
>>> `org-babel-inline-result-wrap' now default to "~%s" (instead of
>>> "=%s"), for markup that produces verbatim text.
>>
>> Here is the patch.
>
> If I understand this thread correctly, = is now consistently
> interpreted as verbatim and ~ as code. I think verbatim (i.e. the
> status quo) is what makes sense for inline babel results – results are
> not generally speaking code (though of course in special cases they
> can be).
>
> I’m not sure what you mean by
>
>> That will put fix back as what they were for people having different
>> CSS or LaTeX styles applied to both markers.
I mean that some of us may have applied CSS to differentiate among
"code" and "verbatim" in HTML.
Anyway, I do agree with you that defaulting to verbatim (instead of
code) makes more sense, in fact, for results of inline babel code
blocks.
Case closed!
Best regards,
Seb
--
Sebastien Vauban