[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] Citation syntax and ODT
From: |
Richard Lawrence |
Subject: |
Re: [O] Citation syntax and ODT |
Date: |
Mon, 23 Feb 2015 15:25:39 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Notmuch/0.13.2 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.4.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) |
Vaidheeswaran C <address@hidden> writes:
>> But whatever style is chosen, I would still think that the fact that the
>> citation is in-text rather than parenthetical, and that it has a prefix
>> and suffix, should be represented in the output.
>
> 1. When you choose 'style' (Chicago etc.) wouldn't be one of in-text
> or parenthetical already chosen for you? Stated other way, is the
> choice between parenthetical or in-text document-wide or is it that
> one could intermix the two styles in the same document.
These could be intermixed in the same document. The document-level
style determines how each type ultimately looks, but the choice of style
is (mostly) independent of using parenthetical vs. in-text citations.
> 2. Citation processor like JabRef just takes a cite-key. It doesn't
> take a pre or post-note. So, the pre and post notes should be
> spliced in to the exported document by the elisp module that
> interfaces with the citation processor.
Right. That's what I'm thinking, anyway.
> If we are going to interface with a citation-processor, the best
> course of action would be to have someone first 'gauge' the
> capabilities provided by the citation processor and let that
> experience inform what Org should aspire to do.
Yes. Other people have more experience with this than me. But based on
what Pandoc is able to do, I am pretty confident that everything that
has been proposed could be handled by a CSL processor like citeproc-js
(or Pandoc's own). The possible exceptions are the common prefix and
common suffix in a multi-work citation, which I imagine would be easy
enough to add to the output of the citation processor.
Best,
Richard
- [O] Citation syntax and ODT, Vaidheeswaran, 2015/02/22
- Re: [O] Citation syntax and ODT, Richard Lawrence, 2015/02/22
- Re: [O] Citation syntax and ODT, Vaidheeswaran, 2015/02/23
- Re: [O] Citation syntax and ODT, Vaidheeswaran, 2015/02/23
- Re: [O] Citation syntax and ODT, Richard Lawrence, 2015/02/23
- Re: [O] Citation syntax and ODT, Vaidheeswaran C, 2015/02/23
- Re: [O] Citation syntax and ODT,
Richard Lawrence <=
- Re: [O] Citation syntax and ODT, Alexis, 2015/02/23
- Re: [O] Citation syntax and ODT, Vaidheeswaran C, 2015/02/23
- Re: [O] Citation syntax and ODT, Vaidheeswaran C, 2015/02/23
- Re: [O] Citation syntax and ODT, Thomas S. Dye, 2015/02/24
- Re: [O] Citation syntax and ODT, Vaidheeswaran C, 2015/02/24
- Re: [O] Citation syntax and ODT, Thomas S. Dye, 2015/02/24
- Re: [O] Citation syntax and ODT, Vaidheeswaran C, 2015/02/24
- Re: [O] Citation syntax and ODT, Thomas S. Dye, 2015/02/24
- Re: [O] Citation syntax and ODT, Jorge A. Alfaro-Murillo, 2015/02/24