[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] Citation syntax: a revised proposal
From: |
Nicolas Goaziou |
Subject: |
Re: [O] Citation syntax: a revised proposal |
Date: |
Tue, 03 Mar 2015 09:38:48 +0100 |
Richard Lawrence <address@hidden> writes:
> Sorry, I may not have emphasized this enough, but in the grammar, I wrote:
>
> - A KEY optionally begins with `-', and obligatorily contains `@' or
> `&' followed by a string of characters which begins with a letter
> or `_', and may contain alphanumeric characters and the following
> *internal* punctuation characters:
> :.#$%&-+?<>~/
>
> The `internal' here was meant to express exactly what Aaron said: keys
> can contain punctuation, but may not end (or begin) with punctuation.
OK. I misunderstood the "internal" part.
What about "@_" and "@a" ? Are they valid keys?
Regards,
- Re: [O] Citation syntax: a revised proposal, (continued)
- Re: [O] Citation syntax: a revised proposal, Rasmus, 2015/03/02
- Re: [O] Citation syntax: a revised proposal, Richard Lawrence, 2015/03/02
- Re: [O] Citation syntax: a revised proposal, Nicolas Goaziou, 2015/03/03
- Re: [O] Citation syntax: a revised proposal, Richard Lawrence, 2015/03/03
- Re: [O] Citation syntax: a revised proposal, Matt Price, 2015/03/03
- Re: [O] Citation syntax: a revised proposal, Nicolas Goaziou, 2015/03/07
Re: [O] Citation syntax: a revised proposal, Aaron Ecay, 2015/03/03
Re: [O] Citation syntax: a revised proposal, Aaron Ecay, 2015/03/02
Re: [O] Citation syntax: a revised proposal, Aaron Ecay, 2015/03/03
Re: [O] Citation syntax: a revised proposal, Rasmus, 2015/03/02
Re: [O] Citation syntax: a revised proposal, Richard Lawrence, 2015/03/03
Re: [O] Citation syntax: a revised proposal, Aaron Ecay, 2015/03/09