[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] [patch, koma-letter] Change of subject behavior
From: |
Nicolas Goaziou |
Subject: |
Re: [O] [patch, koma-letter] Change of subject behavior |
Date: |
Wed, 18 Mar 2015 12:41:17 +0100 |
Rasmus <address@hidden> writes:
>>> + (:with-headline-opening nil nil
>>> org-koma-letter-headline-is-opening-maybe)
>>
>> I don't think this line is required.
>
> It feels more consistent to provide the check through the definition, but
> I'm not willing to pick a fight over this so it's back to just checking
> the variable.
Of course, you're right. It is way better to add it as an option, since
you can override variable value during publishing. You can irrevocably
ignore my comment.
> I have only tested the patch briefly as I need to actually produce a
> letter. But for the letter I'm writing export works fine.
You sent a wrong patch.
Regards,
- [O] [patch, koma-letter] Change of subject behavior, Rasmus, 2015/03/17
- Re: [O] [patch, koma-letter] Change of subject behavior, Nicolas Goaziou, 2015/03/17
- Re: [O] [patch, koma-letter] Change of subject behavior, Rasmus, 2015/03/17
- Re: [O] [patch, koma-letter] Change of subject behavior, Nicolas Goaziou, 2015/03/17
- Re: [O] [patch, koma-letter] Change of subject behavior, Rasmus, 2015/03/17
- Re: [O] [patch, koma-letter] Change of subject behavior,
Nicolas Goaziou <=
- Re: [O] [patch, koma-letter] Change of subject behavior, Rasmus, 2015/03/18
- Re: [O] [patch, koma-letter] Change of subject behavior, Nicolas Goaziou, 2015/03/18
- Re: [O] [patch, koma-letter] Change of subject behavior, Rasmus, 2015/03/19
- Re: [O] [patch, koma-letter] Change of subject behavior, Nicolas Goaziou, 2015/03/19
- Re: [O] [patch, koma-letter] Change of subject behavior, Rasmus, 2015/03/20