[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] org-cite and org-citeproc
From: |
Andreas Leha |
Subject: |
Re: [O] org-cite and org-citeproc |
Date: |
Thu, 02 Apr 2015 20:26:38 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4.50 (darwin) |
Hi,
Richard Lawrence <address@hidden> writes:
> Hi Eric and all,
>
> Eric S Fraga <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> On Wednesday, 1 Apr 2015 at 08:49, Andreas Leha wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> I am a happy biblatex user for all my 'own' documents. But (as was
>>> mentioned previously) scientific journals that accept latex submissions
>>> will require bibtex and won't support biblatex. So, I'd say that one of
>>> the other methods (preferably bibtex) is still necessary.
>>
>> Ahhh, yes, I'd forgotten that journals expect bibtex. This is a key
>> requirement for me as well therefore.
>
> Can someone suggest how a parenthetical citation with common prefix and
> suffix data, like
>
> [(cite): For more on this topic, see:; @Work1 for a review; @Work2;
> and references therein.]
>
> should map to plain BibTeX? Maybe there is no general answer to this
> question, but what would a reasonable default be? Maybe this?
>
> (For more on this topic, see: \cite{Work1} for a review, \cite{Work2},
> and references therein.)
>
> That is, just place the prefix and suffix data in the surrounding text,
> inserting commas after the part for each individual work, and wrapping
> the whole thing in parentheses?
>
To me that seems a reasonable thing to do. At least I would write it
probably in such a way.
Depending on the citation style ("author, year") I might add a comma
after the citation, so that it becomes
(For more on this topic, see: Max Mustermann, 2015, for a review,
The Internet Consortium, 2014, and references therein.)
compared to
(For more on this topic, see: Max Mustermann, 2015 for a review,
The Internet Consortium, 2014 and references therein.)
But:
- I am no native English speaker and comma placement in English
is very unclear to me
- my citation requirements are quite low, I guess...
Best,
Andreas