[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] document depreciation of timeline?
From: |
Nicolas Goaziou |
Subject: |
Re: [O] document depreciation of timeline? |
Date: |
Mon, 24 Aug 2015 22:54:00 +0200 |
Hello,
Gregor Zattler <address@hidden> writes:
> There are only two commits which mention the timeline in their
> summry lines in the newer git history since 2008-01-31.
>
> Shouldn't the feature then be officially depreciated and
> mentioned as stale in the manual? The manual mentions the
> timeline in most cases together with the agenda. And there is a
> small chapter dedicated to the timeline.
>
> If depreciation of the timeline is OK I would patch the manual
> accordingly.
I'm all for it. I think we shouldn't even document deprecated features
in the manual, otherwise, they just never go away.
In any case, Bastien will have the last word on the matter.
Regards,
--
Nicolas Goaziou