|
From: | Richard Hansen |
Subject: | Re: [O] [PATCH v3] fix SETUPFILE pathname expansion with subdirectories |
Date: | Thu, 24 Sep 2015 17:55:14 -0400 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0 |
On 2015-09-24 04:22, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > Applied. Thank you. Thank you! > > Would it make sense to do the same for INCLUDE? If so, would you want to > have a look at it? A chain of #+INCLUDEs already works OK. I'll send a patch that tweaks the test-org-export/expand-include test case to ensure that it continues to work. The intended meanings of #+INCLUDE and #+SETUPFILE have never been clear to me, so I have a couple of questions: * What is supposed to happen if you have a #+SETUPFILE that has an #+INCLUDE? * What is supposed to happen if you have an #+INCLUDE file that has a #+SETUPFILE line? -Richard
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |