[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] ox-tufte-latex
From: |
Thomas S . Dye |
Subject: |
Re: [O] ox-tufte-latex |
Date: |
Fri, 12 Feb 2016 09:02:35 -1000 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 0.9.17; emacs 24.5.1 |
Aloha Eduardo,
Eduardo Mercovich writes:
> However, I would appreciate some help with little details that I'm not
> getting clear, mostly sure because of my ignorance.
>
> + what is the difference between using the :ignore: tag and add
> "COMMENT" as the first characters in the line (the native Org mechanism
> to prevent export)? I tried them and didn't saw the difference.
With the :ignore: tag the headline is ignored, but the text below it is
exported. This is useful for situations like the front matter of a
book, which is mostly assembled by LaTeX. The :ignore: tag allows you
to isolate the various LaTeX commands in your document so they are
separate from the headings with text that you'll write, but still
contribute to the export.
>
> + if I put a plain text link in a sidenote (like
> "\sidenote{see http://AgileManifesto.org}"), it doesn't get
> automagically converted to a link as it is in the text body. It appears
> as normal text and without the \url{...}, so it doesn't look and doesn't
> act as a link.
IIUC, I think you need to tell Org mode that this is a link:
\sidenote{see [[http://AgileManifesto.org]]}.
> + using links as specific Latex markup seems a great idea. However, the
> links face definition makes it specially visible, and impossible to
> separate from any other URL since the properties are hidden. Can that be
> tweaked (maybe not it your class, of course, but in the .emacs file or
> similar), so as to keep the writing flow unperturbed?
I agree that it would be useful to make the appearance of links in the
Org mode buffer configurable on a per-link basis. Different colors for
different kinds of link might go some way to resolving the visual
ambiguities you describe. However, I don't think this is currently
possible.
Expanding link functionality is something that has been discussed on the
mailing list every once in a while for the last several years, but this
is an idea that fails to find traction with the Org mode developers. I
reckon they know best.
In practice, I mouse over the link to see the link type in the minibuffer.
hth,
Tom
--
Thomas S. Dye
http://www.tsdye.com
- Re: [O] ox-tufte-latex, (continued)
- Re: [O] ox-tufte-latex, Lawrence Bottorff, 2016/02/02
- Re: [O] ox-tufte-latex, Rasmus, 2016/02/03
- Re: [O] ox-tufte-latex, Marcin Borkowski, 2016/02/03
- Re: [O] ox-tufte-latex, Rasmus, 2016/02/03
- Re: [O] ox-tufte-latex, Marcin Borkowski, 2016/02/03
- Re: [O] ox-tufte-latex, Thomas S . Dye, 2016/02/03
- Re: [O] ox-tufte-latex, Thomas S . Dye, 2016/02/03
- Re: [O] ox-tufte-latex, Rasmus, 2016/02/03
- Re: [O] ox-tufte-latex, Thomas S . Dye, 2016/02/03
Re: [O] ox-tufte-latex, Eduardo Mercovich, 2016/02/12
- Re: [O] ox-tufte-latex,
Thomas S . Dye <=
- Re: [O] ox-tufte-latex, Eduardo Mercovich, 2016/02/18
- Re: [O] ox-tufte-latex, Thomas S . Dye, 2016/02/18
- Re: [O] ox-tufte-latex, Thomas S . Dye, 2016/02/18
- Re: [O] ox-tufte-latex, Eduardo Mercovich, 2016/02/22
- Re: [O] ox-tufte-latex, Thomas S . Dye, 2016/02/22
Re: [O] ox-tufte-latex, John Hendy, 2016/02/22