[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] "atomic knowledge" modeling tool
From: |
Samuel Loury |
Subject: |
Re: [O] "atomic knowledge" modeling tool |
Date: |
Tue, 16 Feb 2016 15:14:52 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Notmuch/0.19 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.5.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) |
luke call <address@hidden> writes:
> On 02/02/16 00:23, Robert Klein wrote:
[...]
>> As your 'product' is
>> not relevant to org-mode [....]
>
> I mentioned OM here only because I thought it of interest to
> org-mode users, which it evidently was to at least two who thanked me,
> and I answered their questions, in order not to be rude to them.
I also thank you for that :-). For the time being, I use org-mode
because of all the features it provides (clocking, reporting, literate
programming, publishing, etc...). I implement a GTD-like workflow in it
with an integrated pomodoro timer and it works like a charm.
Nevertheless, org-mode is rather slow when my todo.org file becomes
quite large (~20K lines).
Also, it is a real pain to implement a tool that uses its information
From in some other language than elisp. I have been trying for some time
to implement a competitor of MobileOrg with python-for-android/kivy and
the most difficult part is by far extracting the information out of the
.org files. Actually, I am no fall-backing on a client/server approach
in which emacs is the server, giving access to the org content.
I still like a lot the liberty of the "plain text approach" of
org-mode. It is VERY powerful, but it becomes a real problem when
needing to use that power without emacs.
I did not try onemodel yet, but it looks like it palliates those two
problems. I will definitely take a look at it.
Thank you again for sharing.
--
Konubinix
GPG Key : 7439106A
Fingerprint: 5993 BE7A DA65 E2D9 06CE 5C36 75D2 3CED 7439 106A
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Re: [O] "atomic knowledge" modeling tool, luke call, 2016/02/01
- Re: [O] "atomic knowledge" modeling tool, luke call, 2016/02/01
- Re: [O] "atomic knowledge" modeling tool, Robert Klein, 2016/02/02
- Re: [O] "atomic knowledge" modeling tool, luke call, 2016/02/02
- Re: [O] "atomic knowledge" modeling tool,
Samuel Loury <=
- Re: [O] "atomic knowledge" modeling tool, Eric S Fraga, 2016/02/16
- Re: [O] "atomic knowledge" modeling tool, Nicolas Goaziou, 2016/02/16
- Re: [O] "atomic knowledge" modeling tool, Eric S Fraga, 2016/02/16
- Re: [O] "atomic knowledge" modeling tool, Samuel Loury, 2016/02/20
- Re: [O] "atomic knowledge" modeling tool, Nicolas Goaziou, 2016/02/21
- Re: [O] "atomic knowledge" modeling tool, Samuel Loury, 2016/02/22
- Re: [O] "atomic knowledge" modeling tool, Eric S Fraga, 2016/02/24
- Re: [O] "atomic knowledge" modeling tool, Samuel Loury, 2016/02/29