Re: [O] Bug: :export results does not replace previous results designated block

[Nicolas Goaziou]

Hello,

Charles Millar <address@hidden> writes:

> On 02/22/2016 03:17 PM, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Charles Millar <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>>> The last time (last Wednesday or so) I executed the following code
>>>
>>> ** Some subheading
>>> #+NAME: SCHEDAP
>>> #+begin_src rec :data foo.rec :type Finance :fields
>>> AssetDate,Description,Basis :results silent
>>>    (File = 'Estate' && AccountSchedule = 'A')
>>> #+end_src
>>> #+RESULTS: SCHEDAP
>>> #+NAME: SCHEDA
>>> #+begin_src emacs-lisp :var table=SCHEDAP :exports results
>>>     (setq table (cons 'hline table))
>>>     (setq table (cons '("Date" "Description" "Inventory Value") table))
>>>     (setq table (append table '(("|Total Schedule A"))))
>>>     (setq table (append table '(("\n#+TBLFM:
>>> @>$>=vsum(@I$>..@>>$>);%.2f::"))))
>>>     table
>>> #+end_src
>>> #+ATTR_LATEX: :mode table :environment longtable :align
>>> p{60pt}p{300pt}N{8}{2}
>>> #+TBLNAME: SCHEDA
>> [...]
>>
>>> Should I change the code blocks or is this a bug? All of tables
>>> generated by the same or similar code behave the same way - a table
>>> after #+RESULTS: foobar is , but nothing for #+TBLNAME: foobar.
>> What happens if you replace TBLNAME with NAME?
>>
>>
> Same results. I have avoided changing TBLNAME to NAME, though I am not
> sure if I have any reason other than habit.

The problem is that TBLNAME is deprecated and very confusing. 

Actually, here, you seem to be using it as #+RESULTS: (which is
different from #+NAME). You should replace it with #+RESULTS, since you
want to insert the /results/ of "SCHEDA" code evaluation below.

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou