[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] Bug: Bulk reschedule with reschedule logging on fails [8.3.4 (8.
From: |
Allen Li |
Subject: |
Re: [O] Bug: Bulk reschedule with reschedule logging on fails [8.3.4 (8.3.4-5-gdc68d2-elpaplus @ /home/tyria/.emacs.d/elpa/org-plus-contrib-20160229/)] |
Date: |
Mon, 14 Mar 2016 19:57:34 -0700 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 0.9.16; emacs 24.5.1 |
Nicolas Goaziou <address@hidden> writes:
>
> This raises another question, though. What is a reasonable behaviour for
> bulk schedule+log?
I can think of three reasonable options:
1. Prompt for a note, then apply it to all affected items.
2. Prompt for a note, then apply it only to items that are already
scheduled (and hence rescheduled).
3. Don't attempt to add a note and just add timestamps.
Then there's the unreasonable option:
4. Prompt for a note for each item.
If I had to pick, I'd go with 2, but any of 1-3 is fine. In this case,
having bulk scheduling work is more important than whether
org-log-reschedule is being faithfully applied, in my opinion.
Allen
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature