Re: [O] first #+LATEX_HEADER: in SETUPFILE not correctly exported and causes Missing \begin{document} error

[Charles Millar]

On 03/26/2016 01:14 PM, Eric S Fraga wrote:
> On Saturday, 26 Mar 2016 at 10:15, Charles Millar wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > I was not clear - I ran the exports after I made the correction to
> > "mysetup", i.e. \newcommand{\\foo}{bar}
> but I am confused: why the \\ for foo but \ for newcommand?
My typo. Just in case I attach a copy of the "mysetup class" which I 
believe is now correct and which i have been using since your original 
response where you pointed out that \\newcommand, etc. was incorrect . I 
have used this as the latex class for all subsequent messages in this 
thread.

> What is the
> actual result in the output.tex file?
See attached TestLatexformessage.tex
> > I do agree that the one file that exports as desired must be a result
> > of luck. I compared the output.tex file for each document. In each the
> > first \usepackage{foo} which is inserted from the SETUPFILE is
> > indented several tabs or spaces to the right and not aligned to the
> > left margin.
> The indentation or not itself is not the issue but only a symptom of an
> error before that line, in my opinion.
I place the cursor just before \usepackage{lastpage} and backspace once, 
the file builds without the extra page, etc.

Is there a proper location for the #+SETUPFILE: line in the main org file?

Charlie

mysetup-latex-class
Description: Text document

TestLatexformessage.tex
Description: Text Data