[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] Why no secure code retrieval
From: |
Nicolas Goaziou |
Subject: |
Re: [O] Why no secure code retrieval |
Date: |
Thu, 30 Jun 2016 13:50:34 +0200 |
Hello,
Arun Isaac <address@hidden> writes:
>> However, gpg signing release tag commits is dead simple and would
>> take a total of maybe 10 minutes of work over the lifetime of the project
>> (please correct me if I'm wrong).
>
> I second this statement. GPG signing sounds good to me. We should do
> this.
GPG signing tags is OK, but I wouldn't like to request every commit to
be signed.
>> I know that https can be a bit tedious to setup so I am not asking for it
>> (though I do think it would be great if it was enabled on the site in some
>> fashion).
>
> HTTPS is not so tedious these days with Let's Encrypt.
>
> https://letsencrypt.org/
>
> We should set up HTTPS as well.
It would be nice, indeed. I'm Cc'ing Bastien for his opinion on the
matter, and a possible step forward.
Regards,
--
Nicolas Goaziou