[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] [bug] timed repeater shows up in wrong place
From: |
cesar mena |
Subject: |
Re: [O] [bug] timed repeater shows up in wrong place |
Date: |
Sat, 03 Dec 2016 19:31:48 -0500 |
hello,
Nicolas Goaziou <address@hidden> writes:
> Hello,
>
> Samuel Wales <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> thanks for the explanation. the idea is that org 9 is using the
>> previously scheduled section as a complete list and that it did not
>> trigger on the first day and did on the second, and show-all nil in
>> org 9 does not refer to the scheduled section but only to the repeater
>> instances?
>
> I'm not sure to understand.
>
> Anyway, I pushed a change to maint that should solve the "72x vs. 2x"
> issue.
just making sure i'm getting this.
in maint, if org-agenda-repeating-timestamp-show-all is nil we get
72x. if it is non nil we get 2x. i'm in the 72x camp, so i don't need to
do anything.
when master comes around org-agenda-repeating-timestamp-show-all will go
away. to get 72x make sure that org-agenda-prefer-last-repeat is nil (?)
close?
thanks.
-cm
>>> I think we need a new variable, or to change this one, to have both
>>> behaviours possible. Suggestions (and docstrings) are welcome, we can
>>> implement them in master branch.
>>
>> the issues seem to be:
>>
>> 1] 72x vs. 2x
>> 2] duplicate in previously scheduled vs. not
>>
>> 1 is critical as it affects sorting. perhaps
>> org-agenda-repeater-previously-scheduled-counts? values could include
>> 'from-timestamp and 'from-previous-instance.
>> the latter is org 8.
>>
>> 2 is not critical. i might be able to get used to having a complete
>> scheduled section.
>>
>> [dunno if previously-scheduled is a clear name. i call it "nokori"
>> from the japanese for "remaining" merely to be unambiguous [i don't
>> care if it's in sumerian as long as it's unambiguous] but i don't
>> suppose that would work for most people.]
>
> I implemented the following variables in master:
>
> - `org-agenda-show-future-repeats'
> - `org-agenda-prefer-last-repeat'
>
> and removed `org-agenda-repeating-timestamp-show-all', which was
> ambiguous.
>
> Basically, IIUC, setting `org-agenda-show-future-repeats' to nil and
> `org-agenda-prefer-last-repeat' to t should reproduce exactly the
> behaviour of Org 8.
>
> Also, the combination of the two variables above gives more flexibility.
>
> Feedback welcome.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Nicolas Goaziou