Re: [O] BeOrg

[Thomas S. Dye]

Aloha all
Peter Davis writes:

> On Tue, Jan 2, 2018, at 3:43 PM, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> > I think you are missing the point. Free software is primarily 
> > about
> > source code (the four definitions).

> If we refuse to provide useful information just because it 
> violates some
> purist idea of what is or is not acceptably unencumbered, then 
> we’re
> just denying users potential helpful capabilities that may make 
> the
> difference between using org-mode or abandoning it completely in 
> favor
> of some commercial, cross-platform solution.

IIUC, the question is about where to provide this information, not 
whether or not to provide it.  OP asked about putting it in the 
Org manual and Nicolas has pointed out that the manual is for 
documenting Org software.

Perhaps Worg is a better place to provide information about BeOrg?

hth,
Tom

--
Thomas S. Dye
http://www.tsdye.com