[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
`with` as a list.
From: |
Mario Frasca |
Subject: |
`with` as a list. |
Date: |
Fri, 22 May 2020 11:07:08 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.8.0 |
good day to you all
now and then I use emacs to make graphs. now recently I was plotting
point data, and a running average "fit", so I wanted to have points, and
lines, which I know it's possible in `gnuplot` but now how do I do that
from org-plot …
I wrote a small patch for org-plot.el, I'm not a Lisp programmer so I'm
sure the patch looks terrible, but it does allow me to do this:
#+PLOT: ind:1 deps:(3 6 4 7) with:(points lines points lines)
it's two additions:
1. it lets me specify the order in which the dependent columns should be
considered.
2. it lets me specify a different `with` for each column, in the same order.
if you leave the `with` away, you get "lines" for all columns.
if you specify only one `with` value, that value is used for all columns.
if you specify more `deps` than `with`, the ones not specified will get
"lines".
if you specify more `with` than `deps`, they are ignored.
I ran the tests, and I get two failing ones, quite unrelated according
to me:
2 unexpected results:
FAILED ob-exp/evaluate-all-executables-in-order
FAILED ob-exp/export-call-line-information
I have not defined test cases for the new behaviour, I'm willing to do
that (learning the way this test environment works), but I don't find
the location of the other tests related to the area of the program,
which I'm tweaking.
best regards all,
Mario Frasca
with-as-a-list.patch
Description: Text Data
- `with` as a list.,
Mario Frasca <=
- [PATCH] [FEATURE] Re: `with` as a list., Mario Frasca, 2020/05/28
- Re: `with` as a list., Kyle Meyer, 2020/05/30
- Re: `with` as a list., Mario Frasca, 2020/05/30
- Re: `with` as a list., Mario Frasca, 2020/05/30
- Re: `with` as a list., Kyle Meyer, 2020/05/30
- Re: `with` as a list., Mario Frasca, 2020/05/30
- Re: `with` as a list., Mario Frasca, 2020/05/31
- Re: `with` as a list., Kyle Meyer, 2020/05/31
- Re: `with` as a list., Mario Frasca, 2020/05/31
- Re: `with` as a list., Kyle Meyer, 2020/05/31