[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: wip-cite status question and feedback
From: |
Bruce D'Arcus |
Subject: |
Re: wip-cite status question and feedback |
Date: |
Fri, 29 May 2020 18:24:14 -0400 |
On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 6:00 PM András Simonyi <andras.simonyi@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> apologies for reacting that late (it seems that I messed up my email filtering
> royally) ...
I wondered what happened to you; glad you sorted it out though!
...
> (i) Default ("built in") citation processor in Org
>
> I think citeproc-el could be a reasonable solution for this. The core is
> well-tested (thanks to the CSL test suite), implements a fairly large subset
> of
> the CSL 1.01 standard, and can output citations in a number of formats
> including
> in Org syntax. If I understood correctly, this would require citeproc-el to be
> part of Emacs, and not even an ELPA package would suffice. In principle I'm
> open
> to this, but I'm not familiar with the process and there are potential
> pitfalls,
> e.g. citeproc-el currently depends on some "modern" libraries, e.g., "s" or
> "dash" which AFAIK are not in Emacs.
It would very cool if you all could figure out how to make this happen.
It would ensure pretty awesome out-of-box functionality.
Bruce
- Re: wip-cite status question and feedback, (continued)
Re: wip-cite status question and feedback, Nicolas Goaziou, 2020/05/02
Re: wip-cite status question and feedback, Nicolas Goaziou, 2020/05/02
Re: wip-cite status question and feedback, Bastien, 2020/05/24