[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: best practices query: non-emacs packages based on tangled source
From: |
Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide |
Subject: |
Re: best practices query: non-emacs packages based on tangled source |
Date: |
Tue, 27 Oct 2020 23:28:44 +0100 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 1.4.13; emacs 27.1 |
TRS-80 <trs-80@isnotmyreal.name> writes:
> Therefore, any stuff I plan on releasing publicly, I do not do in
> literate style (JMHO). However if you are dead set on doing literate
> paradigm, then maybe my experience is invalid for your use-case.
My experience is that literate style works very well for tutorials, but
whenever I developed a larger program within org-mode, I tangled it once
I had to start debugging and then kept it as separate source.
Once the code becomes complex, I want to stay in one programming
language without outside features that also add extra complexity.
That said, for simple code the additional freedom of multi-language
programming in org-mode is awesome. I’m using that to create random
roleplaying characters directly from random tables in org-mode, with
those tables being the primary source (because the book is the most
important product, not the code).
Best wishes,
Arne
--
Unpolitisch sein
heißt politisch sein
ohne es zu merken
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- best practices query: non-emacs packages based on tangled source, Greg Minshall, 2020/10/15
- Re: best practices query: non-emacs packages based on tangled source, Tim Cross, 2020/10/15
- Re: best practices query: non-emacs packages based on tangled source, Eric S Fraga, 2020/10/16
- Re: best practices query: non-emacs packages based on tangled source, Diego Zamboni, 2020/10/16
- Re: best practices query: non-emacs packages based on tangled source, TEC, 2020/10/16
- Re: best practices query: non-emacs packages based on tangled source, TRS-80, 2020/10/27
- Re: best practices query: non-emacs packages based on tangled source,
Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide <=