[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [wip-cite-new] New natbib processor
From: |
Bruce D'Arcus |
Subject: |
Re: [wip-cite-new] New natbib processor |
Date: |
Wed, 5 May 2021 17:25:40 -0400 |
On Wed, May 5, 2021 at 2:08 PM Bruce D'Arcus <bdarcus@gmail.com> wrote:
> I did some basic testing, and it seems to work well in general ...
That was just looking at the citation output, of course.
Now I did the real test: would LaTeX -> PDF work.
Answer: not ATM.
Here's my minimal document:
----
[cite/text/alt:see ;@mann-68]
[cite//alt/caps:@mann-68]
[cite//full:@mann-68]
[cite//caps:@mann-68]
#+cite_export: natbib
#+bibliography: test.bib
----
... but when I run the export, I get an "undefined citation" error.
The key is correct, as is the file name, which is in the same directly
as the test file.
What am I missing?
Bruce
- [wip-cite-new] New natbib processor, Nicolas Goaziou, 2021/05/05
- Re: [wip-cite-new] New natbib processor, Bruce D'Arcus, 2021/05/05
- Re: [wip-cite-new] New natbib processor, Bruce D'Arcus, 2021/05/05
- Re: [wip-cite-new] New natbib processor,
Bruce D'Arcus <=
- Re: [wip-cite-new] New natbib processor, Bruce D'Arcus, 2021/05/05
- Re: [wip-cite-new] New natbib processor, Bruce D'Arcus, 2021/05/05
- Re: [wip-cite-new] New natbib processor, Denis Maier, 2021/05/06
- Re: [wip-cite-new] New natbib processor, Bruce D'Arcus, 2021/05/06
- Re: [wip-cite-new] New natbib processor, Bruce D'Arcus, 2021/05/06
- Re: [wip-cite-new] New natbib processor, Nicolas Goaziou, 2021/05/06
- Re: [wip-cite-new] New natbib processor, Bruce D'Arcus, 2021/05/06
- Re: [wip-cite-new] New natbib processor, Nicolas Goaziou, 2021/05/06
- Re: [wip-cite-new] New natbib processor, Bruce D'Arcus, 2021/05/06
- Re: [wip-cite-new] New natbib processor, Nicolas Goaziou, 2021/05/06