|
From: | Maxim Nikulin |
Subject: | Re: Notes about citations in Org (part 3) |
Date: | Thu, 6 May 2021 22:57:57 +0700 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.1 |
On 06/05/2021 18:53, Bruce D'Arcus wrote:
Your example should just use the default org-cite citation, without any style or sub-style. The rest would be handled by latex/bibtex. Right?
Yes, simple \cite{k1,k2} is mostly enough for numeric citations. E.g cases like separated list of references to author's works are handled by a customized \begin{thebibliography} and dedicated counter having some prefix.
There is might be some uncertainty concerning handling of prefixes and suffixes. However my impression is that even e.g. \cite[p.~7]{key} is quite rare. For completeness, keys without prefixes, suffixes could be combined into single \cite{key1,key2}, otherwise individual \cite{key1} may be required with additional text in between.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |