|
From: | Max Nikulin |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Don't fill displayed equations |
Date: | Sun, 3 Oct 2021 19:04:53 +0700 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0 |
On 03/10/2021 17:56, Stefan Nobis wrote:
Max Nikulin writes:On 03/10/2021 00:51, Tom Gillespie wrote:I guess one thing I'm missing/not understanding is when/why people want to use \[ \] instead of full #+begin_export latex block?For example, because document without equations may become almost useless in the case of export to HTML or ODT file.Remember, as Nicolas said, the alternative to \[...\] is not a "#+begin_export" block, but \begin{equation*} ... \end{equation*}
Maybe you are right and Tom was actually assuming \begin{equation*}, not #+begin_export latex. Since Tom and Timothy started discussion of LaTeX preview issues, it was better to clarify that #+begin_export is not a rescue here at all, it has different purpose.
Just as Timothy, I believe that \begin{equation*} is unnecessary verbose when \[ works *mostly* in a similar way. It shifts the border when it is easier to avoid Org for particular paper and to write LaTeX markup directly.
Another branch of this thread is refactoring of `org-fill-element', but in my opinion, if \[ \] remains an inline object, adding a special case for it is anyway increasing overall mess. It \[ \] were became block-level element, it would not be necessary.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |