[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [possible patch] Basic fontspec code for LuaLaTeX and XelaTeX (was "
From: |
Juan Manuel Macías |
Subject: |
Re: [possible patch] Basic fontspec code for LuaLaTeX and XelaTeX (was "LaTeX export: when is it more useful...") |
Date: |
Mon, 11 Jul 2022 15:00:05 +0000 |
Timothy writes:
> As an illustrative example, if I include this in one of my documents and
> create
> a PDF:
> ┌────
> │ #+options: fontset:biolinum
> └────
>
> Then I’ll get text with:
> ⁃ libertine roman as the serif font
> ⁃ biolinum as the serif, and default, font
> ⁃ source code pro as the mono font
> ⁃ newtxmath as the maths font
>
> Similarly I can do `fontset:noto' and you can guess what that does.
I think it's a very good idea to be able to add the options using
#+options:..., forgive the redundancy :-)
When you talk about fontset, I understand that you mean lists of
families with their options that you have previously defined, is that
right?
In any case, I think it would also be nice if the user could add only
one family for roman, sans, mono or math, if he/she prefers it that way.
Something like:
#+options: rmfont:Minion Pro
Best regards,
Juan Manuel
- Re: LaTeX export: when is it more useful to use LuaTeX instead of pdfTeX?, (continued)
- Re: LaTeX export: when is it more useful to use LuaTeX instead of pdfTeX?, Max Nikulin, 2022/07/09
- Re: LaTeX export: when is it more useful to use LuaTeX instead of pdfTeX?, Juan Manuel Macías, 2022/07/09
- Message not available
- Re: LaTeX export: when is it more useful to use LuaTeX instead of pdfTeX?, Juan Manuel Macías, 2022/07/09
- [possible patch] Basic fontspec code for LuaLaTeX and XelaTeX (was "LaTeX export: when is it more useful..."), Juan Manuel Macías, 2022/07/10
- Re: [possible patch] Basic fontspec code for LuaLaTeX and XelaTeX (was "LaTeX export: when is it more useful..."), Juan Manuel Macías, 2022/07/10
- Re: [possible patch] Basic fontspec code for LuaLaTeX and XelaTeX (was "LaTeX export: when is it more useful..."), Tim Cross, 2022/07/10
- Re: [possible patch] Basic fontspec code for LuaLaTeX and XelaTeX (was "LaTeX export: when is it more useful..."), Juan Manuel Macías, 2022/07/11
- Re: [possible patch] Basic fontspec code for LuaLaTeX and XelaTeX (was "LaTeX export: when is it more useful..."), Ihor Radchenko, 2022/07/10
- Re: [possible patch] Basic fontspec code for LuaLaTeX and XelaTeX (was "LaTeX export: when is it more useful..."), Stefan Nobis, 2022/07/11
- Re: [possible patch] Basic fontspec code for LuaLaTeX and XelaTeX (was "LaTeX export: when is it more useful..."), Timothy, 2022/07/11
- Re: [possible patch] Basic fontspec code for LuaLaTeX and XelaTeX (was "LaTeX export: when is it more useful..."),
Juan Manuel Macías <=
- Re: fontsets (was: [possible patch] Basic fontspec code for LuaLaTeX and XelaTeX (was "LaTeX export: when is it more useful...")), Timothy, 2022/07/11
- Re: fontsets, Juan Manuel Macías, 2022/07/11
- Re: fontsets, Stefan Nobis, 2022/07/12
- Re: fontsets, Juan Manuel Macías, 2022/07/12
- Fallback fonts in LuaTeX via 'luaotfload.add_fallback' (was "Fontsets"), Juan Manuel Macías, 2022/07/12
- Re: Fallback fonts in LuaTeX via 'luaotfload.add_fallback' (was "Fontsets"), Max Nikulin, 2022/07/15
- Re: [possible patch] Basic fontspec code for LuaLaTeX and XelaTeX (was "LaTeX export: when is it more useful..."), Greg Minshall, 2022/07/10
- Re: [possible patch] Basic fontspec code for LuaLaTeX and XelaTeX (was "LaTeX export: when is it more useful..."), Stefan Nobis, 2022/07/11
- Re: [possible patch] Basic fontspec code for LuaLaTeX and XelaTeX (was "LaTeX export: when is it more useful..."), Juan Manuel Macías, 2022/07/11
- Re: [possible patch] Basic fontspec code for LuaLaTeX and XelaTeX (was "LaTeX export: when is it more useful..."), Juan Manuel Macías, 2022/07/11