[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: @string abbreviation in bib file not honored in (basic) org-cite [an
From: |
Alain . Cochard |
Subject: |
Re: @string abbreviation in bib file not honored in (basic) org-cite [and a minimal working example with natbib] |
Date: |
Wed, 13 Jul 2022 06:52:32 +0200 |
Alain.Cochard@unistra.fr writes on Sat 9 Jul 2022 08:10:
> the examples I found on this mailing list did not work for me).
I think I now understand why this was so: because latexmk was not
installed on my system. In this case the docstring of
org-latex-pdf-process says that
Its value is ("%latex -interaction nonstopmode -output-directory %o
%f" "%latex -interaction nonstopmode -output-directory %o %f"
"%latex -interaction nonstopmode -output-directory %o %f")
(which does not include bibtex, hence the problem I had) while, if
latexmk is installed,
Its value is ("latexmk -f -pdf -%latex -interaction=nonstopmode
-output-directory=%o %f")
In other words, in the minimal example I provided earlier in the
thread, if latexmk is installed I only need (require 'oc-natbib) in
the emacs init file, in agreement with what others have proposed.
But now I wonder if this excerpt of the docstring:
Consider a smart LaTeX compiler such as ‘texi2dvi’ or ‘latexmk’,
which calls the "correct" combinations of auxiliary programs.
is appropriate. How understand it when latexmk _is_ installed? But
even when latexmk is not installed, I don't find the sentence helpful.
In fact, I had read this part but, as I did not know what latexmk was,
I did not know what to do with it. Perhaps I would have understood if
it had been explicit that the value of org-latex-pdf-process depends
on the existence of latexmk. (And I still don't understand the
relevance of the reference to texi2dvi.)
--
EOST (École et Observatoire des Sciences de la Terre)
ITE (Institut Terre & Environnement) | alain.cochard@unistra.fr
5 rue René Descartes [bureau 106] | Phone: +33 (0)3 68 85 50 44
F-67084 Strasbourg Cedex, France | [ slot available for rent ]
- Can citeproc be installed without using MELPA? (was: @string abbreviation in bib file not honored in (basic) org-cite), (continued)
Re: @string abbreviation in bib file not honored in (basic) org-cite [and a minimal working example with natbib], Alain . Cochard, 2022/07/09
- Re: @string abbreviation in bib file not honored in (basic) org-cite [and a minimal working example with natbib], Bruce D'Arcus, 2022/07/09
- Re: @string abbreviation in bib file not honored in (basic) org-cite [and a minimal working example with natbib], Ihor Radchenko, 2022/07/10
- Re: @string abbreviation in bib file not honored in (basic) org-cite [and a minimal working example with natbib], András Simonyi, 2022/07/12
- Re: @string abbreviation in bib file not honored in (basic) org-cite [and a minimal working example with natbib], John Kitchin, 2022/07/12
- Re: @string abbreviation in bib file not honored in (basic) org-cite [and a minimal working example with natbib], András Simonyi, 2022/07/12
Re: @string abbreviation in bib file not honored in (basic) org-cite [and a minimal working example with natbib],
Alain . Cochard <=
Re: @string abbreviation in bib file not honored in (basic) org-cite, Ihor Radchenko, 2022/07/17