[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GPL violation related to Org by priprietary app (was: Best android a
From: |
tomas |
Subject: |
Re: GPL violation related to Org by priprietary app (was: Best android app) |
Date: |
Tue, 25 Oct 2022 15:45:06 +0200 |
On Wed, Oct 26, 2022 at 12:12:46AM +1100, Tim Cross wrote:
[...]
> Even if it was violated, this is not something the maintainers are
> empowered to act on anyway [...]
This depends perhaps on what one understands by "act on". If that
means "go to court" you are, of course, right. If that means just
"make aware FSF legal of a possible violation", then the question
here boils just down to "do we have enough confidence to justify
annoying FSF legal with this?
> Also, based on my limited legal experience and past dealings with
> trademarks, copyright and licenses, I don't think there has been either
> a GPL license violation or a trade mark violation. However, if someone
> believes differently, they should refer the matter to the FSF legal
> office.
Exactly.
Cheers
--
t
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Re: Best android app, (continued)
Re: Best android app, Ihor Radchenko, 2022/10/23
Re: Best android app, Jean Louis, 2022/10/24
GPL violation related to Org by priprietary app (was: Best android app), Ihor Radchenko, 2022/10/25
Re: GPL violation related to Org by priprietary app (was: Best android app), Jean Louis, 2022/10/25
Re: GPL violation related to Org by priprietary app (was: Best android app), Ihor Radchenko, 2022/10/25
Re: GPL violation related to Org by priprietary app (was: Best android app), Tim Cross, 2022/10/25
Re: GPL violation related to Org by priprietary app (was: Best android app),
tomas <=