[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Docstrings and literate programming (good practices?)
From: |
Ihor Radchenko |
Subject: |
Re: Docstrings and literate programming (good practices?) |
Date: |
Fri, 04 Nov 2022 08:49:04 +0000 |
Samuel Wales <samologist@gmail.com> writes:
> why not include the docstrings of all commands in some nice format in
> the .org manual via some mechanism?
>
> would that be a good practice? seems useful abstractly.
There are two problems:
1. We need to convert from Elisp docstring format to Org markup
2. More importantly, User manual is something to be written as a
coherent text; not an agglomeration of docstring. (Yes, I am aware of
the fact that it is not always the case in practice; But we should
not encourage the current situation)
--
Ihor Radchenko // yantar92,
Org mode contributor,
Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>.
Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>,
or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92>
- Re: Docstrings and literate programming (good practices?), (continued)
Re: Docstrings and literate programming (good practices?), Rudolf Adamkovič, 2022/11/03
Re: Docstrings and literate programming (good practices?),
Ihor Radchenko <=
Re: Docstrings and literate programming (good practices?), Samuel Wales, 2022/11/04
Re: Docstrings and literate programming (good practices?), Samuel Wales, 2022/11/07
Re: Docstrings and literate programming (good practices?), Max Nikulin, 2022/11/04