[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [POLL] Proposed syntax for timestamps with time zone info
From: |
Jean Louis |
Subject: |
Re: [POLL] Proposed syntax for timestamps with time zone info |
Date: |
Wed, 01 Feb 2023 15:45:48 -0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/2.2.9+54 (af2080d) (2022-11-21) |
* tomas@tuxteam.de <tomas@tuxteam.de> [2023-02-01 12:22]:
> ...which stems from the fact that the very concept of "time zone"
> is somewhat ambiguous, too.
For human who reads it without calculating anything, yes.
For computer which is supposed to be programmed by using the time zone
database, no.
> Some time zone designations carry the fact of whether they are
> supposed to be summer times or not with them (as with CET/CEST),
> some not (as above). The time zone database is only known for a
> limited time into future and may change with political
> vagaries. Yadda, yadda.
Very right.
At least the history is more certain than the future in regards to
time calculations with computer.
--
Jean
Take action in Free Software Foundation campaigns:
https://www.fsf.org/campaigns
In support of Richard M. Stallman
https://stallmansupport.org/
Re: [POLL] Proposed syntax for timestamps with time zone info (was: [FEATURE REQUEST] Timezone support in org-mode datestamps and org-agenda), Jean Louis, 2023/02/01
Re: [POLL] Proposed syntax for timestamps with time zone info, Stefan Nobis, 2023/02/01
Re: [POLL] Proposed syntax for timestamps with time zone info, Jean Louis, 2023/02/01
Re: [POLL] Proposed syntax for timestamps with time zone info (was: [FEATURE REQUEST] Timezone support in org-mode datestamps and org-agenda), Thomas S. Dye, 2023/02/01
Re: [POLL] Proposed syntax for timestamps with time zone info (was: [FEATURE REQUEST] Timezone support in org-mode datestamps and org-agenda), Christian Moe, 2023/02/01