[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Supporting non-free SQL clients in ob-sql (was: [PATCH] ob-sql: Add
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Supporting non-free SQL clients in ob-sql (was: [PATCH] ob-sql: Add support for Athena) |
Date: |
Sat, 04 Feb 2023 00:15:56 -0500 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> > I think it is a good idea to document the reasoning for these
> > decision. But I think it does not necessarily have to be centralized
> > in one file for all of Emacs. Another alternative, also natural,
> > would be to describe these decisions with the code that implements the
> > support.
> Will file header be a good place?
It's a reasonable candidate.
> Note that there is little point adding the reasons behind supporting
> non-free software if they cannot be easily found. Ideally, it should be
> a standard place documented as code convention. Then, people can
> consistently check the reasons (or lack of) behind each individual
> non-free software support decision.
That is a valid point.
Sorry for the delay.
--
Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org)
Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org)
Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)
- Re: Supporting non-free SQL clients in ob-sql (was: [PATCH] ob-sql: Add support for Athena),
Richard Stallman <=