[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [POLL] Proposed syntax for timestamps with time zone info (was: [FEA
From: |
ypuntot |
Subject: |
Re: [POLL] Proposed syntax for timestamps with time zone info (was: [FEATURE REQUEST] Timezone support in org-mode datestamps and org-agenda) |
Date: |
Sun, 5 Feb 2023 14:01:31 +0100 (GMT+01:00) |
For the Poll, the Jeans proposal would be to introduce manually:
[2024-02-04 12:00 @America/Vancouver]
And org to convert it into:
[2024-02-04 12:00 @-08,America/Vancouver]
?
Ihor's would add the option to get warnings, in case tzdata changes, when that
timestamp is generated?
[2024-02-04 12:00 @-08,!America/Vancouver]
?
Feb 5, 2023 13:12:25 Jean Louis <bugs@gnu.support>:
> * Ihor Radchenko <yantar92@posteo.net> [2023-02-05 13:45]:
>> [2024-02-04 12:00 @-08,America/Vancouver] will use fixed -8 offset
>
> What does that mean practically? Provide example for better
> understanding.
>
> - The UTC offset is not certain to remain fixed in the future.
>
> - If you do not have the time of creation of the timestamp above, you
> cannot know with certainty what was the offset in past, to calculate
> new UTC offset in case it changed
>
> - As not even time zone is certain to remain in existence in future,
> you will need to use time zone, in order to derive that future UTC
> offset correctly. As it could change in mean time.
>
> What is meaning of "fixed -8 offset"?
>
>> [2024-02-04 12:00 @-08] will also use fixed -8 offset
>
> That type of timestamp does not clearly show the time zone, that one
> may only be understood as timestamp with UTC offset. UTC time may be
> derived from such timestamp. That offset should remain fixed, as there
> is no time zone associated. It is UTC time represented with offset.
>
>> [2024-02-04 12:00 @America/Vancouver] will use @America/Vancouver time
>> zone, as it is be defined in you OS time zone database.
>
> If you do not keep UTC offset, you will miss changes in future and
> generate errors.
>
>> [2024-02-04 12:00 @-08,!America/Vancouver] (note "!") will use fixed -8
>> offset, but also calculate America/Vancouver time from TZ database,
>> compare it with the time coming from -8 offset, and warn you if there is
>> inconsistency.
>
> The UTC offset is the log what was the UTC offset at the time point
> when timestamp was created, as future UTC offset cannot be known.
>
> Making it "fixed" does not fix it in real time, you are then
> introducing something new than what other programs do with time.
>
> I do not think that you need "!", you are creating work not necessary
> for users.
>
> If users wish to get some warnings, let them customize single option.
>
> Not timestamp by timestamp.
>
> --
> Jean
>
> Take action in Free Software Foundation campaigns:
> https://www.fsf.org/campaigns
>
> In support of Richard M. Stallman
> https://stallmansupport.org/
- Re: [POLL] Proposed syntax for timestamps with time zone info, (continued)
- Re: [POLL] Proposed syntax for timestamps with time zone info (was: [FEATURE REQUEST] Timezone support in org-mode datestamps and org-agenda), ypuntot, 2023/02/04
- Re: [POLL] Proposed syntax for timestamps with time zone info (was: [FEATURE REQUEST] Timezone support in org-mode datestamps and org-agenda), Ypo, 2023/02/04
- Re: [POLL] Proposed syntax for timestamps with time zone info (was: [FEATURE REQUEST] Timezone support in org-mode datestamps and org-agenda), Max Nikulin, 2023/02/04
- Re: [POLL] Proposed syntax for timestamps with time zone info (was: [FEATURE REQUEST] Timezone support in org-mode datestamps and org-agenda), Jean Louis, 2023/02/05
- Re: [POLL] Proposed syntax for timestamps with time zone info (was: [FEATURE REQUEST] Timezone support in org-mode datestamps and org-agenda), Ihor Radchenko, 2023/02/05
- Re: [POLL] Proposed syntax for timestamps with time zone info (was: [FEATURE REQUEST] Timezone support in org-mode datestamps and org-agenda), Ihor Radchenko, 2023/02/06
- Re: [POLL] Proposed syntax for timestamps with time zone info (was: [FEATURE REQUEST] Timezone support in org-mode datestamps and org-agenda), Jean Louis, 2023/02/07
- Re: [POLL] Proposed syntax for timestamps with time zone info (was: [FEATURE REQUEST] Timezone support in org-mode datestamps and org-agenda), Ihor Radchenko, 2023/02/08
- Re: [POLL] Proposed syntax for timestamps with time zone info (was: [FEATURE REQUEST] Timezone support in org-mode datestamps and org-agenda), Jean Louis, 2023/02/09
- Re: [POLL] Proposed syntax for timestamps with time zone info (was: [FEATURE REQUEST] Timezone support in org-mode datestamps and org-agenda), Ihor Radchenko, 2023/02/10
- Re: [POLL] Proposed syntax for timestamps with time zone info (was: [FEATURE REQUEST] Timezone support in org-mode datestamps and org-agenda), Jean Louis, 2023/02/12
- Re: [POLL] Proposed syntax for timestamps with time zone info (was: [FEATURE REQUEST] Timezone support in org-mode datestamps and org-agenda), tomas, 2023/02/12
- Re: [POLL] Proposed syntax for timestamps with time zone info (was: [FEATURE REQUEST] Timezone support in org-mode datestamps and org-agenda), Jean Louis, 2023/02/14