[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Should we extend org-catch-invisible-edits to more interactive commands?
From: |
Ihor Radchenko |
Subject: |
Should we extend org-catch-invisible-edits to more interactive commands? (was: Catching invisible edits: problem understanding doc) |
Date: |
Fri, 10 Feb 2023 09:56:34 +0000 |
Alain.Cochard@unistra.fr writes:
> M-x undo
>
> I visually see no change, but I can observe by unfolding the headline
> that 'bar' has disappeared. In my understanding of the documentation
> above and of the docstring for org-fold-catch-invisible-edits, this
> should only happen with 'nil'.
>
> What am I understanding incorrectly? Thank you.
Only a handful of interactive commands support invisible edit checks. In
particular: self-insert-command (typing), deleting char
forward/backward, and `org-meta-return'.
I guess we may instead provide a defcustom and hook the check into
`pre-command-hook'. Would it be of interest?
> PS: a very minor incidental point: after 'bar' has disappeared, the
> headline is then void, so I tend to say that the ellipsis should
> immediately disappear as well.
The headline still contains newlines.
--
Ihor Radchenko // yantar92,
Org mode contributor,
Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>.
Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>,
or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92>
- Catching invisible edits: problem understanding doc, Alain . Cochard, 2023/02/09
- Should we extend org-catch-invisible-edits to more interactive commands? (was: Catching invisible edits: problem understanding doc),
Ihor Radchenko <=
- Re: Should we extend org-catch-invisible-edits to more interactive commands? (was: Catching invisible edits: problem understanding doc), Alain . Cochard, 2023/02/11
- Re: Should we extend org-catch-invisible-edits to more interactive commands? (was: Catching invisible edits: problem understanding doc), Ihor Radchenko, 2023/02/11
- Re: Should we extend org-catch-invisible-edits to more interactive commands? (was: Catching invisible edits: problem understanding doc), Alain . Cochard, 2023/02/12
- [PATCH] Allow customizing commands affected by `org-fold-catch-invisible-edits' (was: Should we extend org-catch-invisible-edits to more interactive commands? (was: Catching invisible edits: problem understanding doc)), Ihor Radchenko, 2023/02/12
- Re: [PATCH] Allow customizing commands affected by `org-fold-catch-invisible-edits' (was: Should we extend org-catch-invisible-edits to more interactive commands? (was: Catching invisible edits: problem understanding doc)), Alain . Cochard, 2023/02/14
- Re: [PATCH] Allow customizing commands affected by `org-fold-catch-invisible-edits' (was: Should we extend org-catch-invisible-edits to more interactive commands? (was: Catching invisible edits: problem understanding doc)), Ihor Radchenko, 2023/02/16
- Re: [PATCH] Allow customizing commands affected by `org-fold-catch-invisible-edits' (was: Should we extend org-catch-invisible-edits to more interactive commands? (was: Catching invisible edits: problem understanding doc)), Alain . Cochard, 2023/02/17