[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Re: [POLL] Naming of "export features"
From: |
Pedro Andres Aranda Gutierrez |
Subject: |
Re: Re: [POLL] Naming of "export features" |
Date: |
Thu, 23 Feb 2023 18:50:58 +0100 |
No Wayman writes:
> It appears context is king.
> All that aside, I think Ihor's proposal sidesteps the whole issue
> while addressing the complexity of the implementation.
I read
#+cite_export: processor_x options:blablabla
as
"When I want to export citations using 'processor_x' , add options
blablabla to it"
That gives enough context information, IMvHO.
And it hides the implementation specifics ...
/P
--
Fragen sind nicht da um beantwortet zu werden,
Fragen sind da um gestellt zu werden
Georg Kreisler
Headaches with a Juju log:
unit-basic-16: 09:17:36 WARNING juju.worker.uniter.operation we should
run a leader-deposed hook here, but we can't yet