|
From: | Max Nikulin |
Subject: | Re: Exporting elisp: and shell: links |
Date: | Tue, 19 Sep 2023 22:19:06 +0700 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.15.0 |
On 19/09/2023 07:10, Rudolf Adamkovič wrote:
Max Nikulin <manikulin@gmail.com> writes:Do you think a label specifying language should be added to code snippets, e.g. <code title="elisp">(identity "a")</code> or it is useless and may cause undesired noise for screen reader users? What about LaTeX?As a user, I would expect [[elisp:(identity "a")]] to be export-equivalent to src_elisp[:exports code]{(identity "a")} across all backends.
(defun org-link-export-eval-link-no-descr (type path descr backend info) (unless descr (let ((element (org-element-create 'inline-src-block (list :language type :value path :parameters ":exports code :noweb no :eval never")))) (org-export-data element info)))) (defun org-link-make-export-eval-link-no-descr (type) (lambda (path descr backend info) (org-link-export-eval-link-no-descr type path descr backend info))) (dolist (type '("elisp" "shell")) (org-link-set-parameters type :export (org-link-make-export-eval-link-no-descr type)))
What is your expectation for links having description? [[elisp:(identity "a")][Run it]]Good point! Perhaps we just need to find a good symbol that would work well between the Elisp code and the description? For example /Run it/ \to src_elisp[:exports code]{(identity "a")} exports to ASCII as /Run it/ -> `(identity "a")' Of course, \to could be something else...
I have another example: [[elisp:(server-start)][=M-x server-start RET=]] suitable for a printed document.From my point of view, it is better either to drop link path completely or to add a button to copy the code to clipboard. Repetition is undesired.
So I am unsure if it is possible to choose unambiguous rules for export of elisp and shell links.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |