Re: Should org-link-parser add type "file" when link has no "file:" prefix?

[joseph]

February 1, 2024 at 4:23 AM, "Ihor Radchenko" <yantar92@posteo.net> wrote:



> 
> joseph@ushin.org writes:
> 
> > 
> > > 
> > > > > What we can do then is pass an extra argument to :follow function - 
> > > > > the
> > > 
> > >  > > link object. That way, :follow function can get all the information 
> > > it
> > > 
> > >  > > needs.
> > > 
> > >  > > 
> > > 
> > >  > 
> > > 
> > >  > I like this idea! Would this change break existing :follow functions
> > > 
> > >  > which only expect max two args?
> > > 
> > >  > 
> > > 
> > >  
> > > 
> > >  No. We can preserve backwards-compatibility by checking :follow function
> > > 
> > >  arity and only passing the extra argument with the :follow function
> > > 
> > >  supports that many arguments.
> > > 
> > 
> >  Good to know. If the goals of hyperdrive.el can be accomplished without 
> > adding complexity to Org mode, it may be best to avoid avoid adding another 
> > argument to :follow functions. WDYT?
> > 
> 
> I did not make any changes to Org mode. And I will not, unless we need
> 
> to pass this extra information to :follow functions.

Thank you!  I think we can close this issue.  Can I close the issue myself?

> -- 
> 
> Ihor Radchenko // yantar92,
> 
> Org mode contributor,
> 
> Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/> https://orgmode.org/%3E .
> 
> Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>, 
> https://liberapay.com/org-mode%3E, 
> 
> or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92> 
> https://liberapay.com/yantar92%3E
>