Re: [BUG] Unsolicited download of remote resources

[Leo Butler]

On Mon, Feb 05 2024, Ihor Radchenko <yantar92@posteo.net> wrote:

> Leo Butler <Leo.Butler@umanitoba.ca> writes:
>
>> Q: if #+setupfile points to a real file available to download, does Org
>> evaluate that file?
>
> keywords and startup options are taken from there. No Elisp code present
> in #+SETUPFILE is evaluated.
>
> That said, if the file defines babel header arguments with elisp or
> "eval" macros, they may be used later, during export or when src block
> evaluation is requested by the user.

So, it is *possible* to have the setupfile set-up arbitrary elisp code
that would be evaluated at some later time (during export or src block
evaluation, as you wrote)? Is that correct?

Leo