Re: [PATCH] org-agenda: Make sure skipping warning/delay days never increases their number

[Ihor Radchenko]

Tim Ruffing <crypto@timruffing.de> writes:

> Hm, now that I think about it again, I'm not sure that defining a new
> function is worth the hassle. There's nothing wrong with the current 
> function or the optional argument, in the sense that callers can simply
> choose not to use the optional argument.
>
> If anything, I think it would rather add a comment that it's
> obsolete/there for historical reasons and should not be used. Let me
> know if you think that's desirable.

Yes, we can add such a comment to the docstring.
However, your total contributions are now at the limit we can legally
accept without FSF copyright assignment.
Would you consider doing copyright paperwork as described in
<https://orgmode.org/worg/org-contribute.html#copyright>?

> Subject: [PATCH] org-agenda: Make sure skipping warning/delay days never
>  increases their number

Applied, onto main, with minor amendments to the commit message.
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git/commit/?id=356072c1d
Thanks!

-- 
Ihor Radchenko // yantar92,
Org mode contributor,
Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>.
Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>,
or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92>