[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Support for whitespace prefix for :noweb-prefix
From: |
Ihor Radchenko |
Subject: |
Re: Support for whitespace prefix for :noweb-prefix |
Date: |
Fri, 29 Mar 2024 12:51:14 +0000 |
Doerthous <doerthous@gmail.com> writes:
> Ihor Radchenko <yantar92@posteo.net> writes:
>
>> I think that a more general approach could be allowing :noweb-prefix to
>> have a value of string that will be appended to each line on the
>> expansion.
>
> With the use case discussed before, is allowing :noweb-prefix to have a
> value of string means I need to provide a string with 5 space
> characters to :noweb-ref like this?
> #+begin_src elisp :noweb yes :noweb-prefix " "
> (let (<<varable-bindings>>)
> <<do-something>>)
> #+end_src
Yes.
I still feel that what you are really looking for is major-mode-specific
indentation, not a prefix. Because indentation may require tabs, not
spaces. Or may interfere with programming language.
--
Ihor Radchenko // yantar92,
Org mode contributor,
Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>.
Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>,
or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92>
- Support for whitespace prefix for :noweb-prefix, Doerthous, 2024/03/28
- Re: Support for whitespace prefix for :noweb-prefix, Ihor Radchenko, 2024/03/28
- Re: Support for whitespace prefix for :noweb-prefix, Doerthous, 2024/03/28
- Re: Support for whitespace prefix for :noweb-prefix, Ihor Radchenko, 2024/03/29
- Re: Support for whitespace prefix for :noweb-prefix, Doerthous, 2024/03/29
- Re: Support for whitespace prefix for :noweb-prefix,
Ihor Radchenko <=
- Re: Support for whitespace prefix for :noweb-prefix, Doerthous, 2024/03/29
- Re: Support for whitespace prefix for :noweb-prefix, Ihor Radchenko, 2024/03/29
- Re: Support for whitespace prefix for :noweb-prefix, Doerthous, 2024/03/29